13 December

Nofollow Can Upset Webmasters!

Posted by Mike | Filed under Google, Link Building

I received lots of e-mails from potential advertisers and they asked if the text ads that I sell have the nofollow tag or not. I told them that I put nofollow on all text ads because I believe that those links are placed here for advertisement purposes, not for SEO and PageRank *cough* purposes.

After a few moments, I received a reply from one of the people who wanted to buy text ads. The reply was rather rude and inconsiderate. Here’s the e-mail:

E-mail

After reading the e-mail, I was like “Oh… so there are still people who are crazy about PR.” I was a bit surprised actually. I thought that people stopped caring about PR!

As you can see, he said that he was upset because the webmasters that he contacted all put nofollow tags on text ads. I think he’s that crazy for PageRank. :mrgreen: He’s the only one that complained to me about this issue.

He clearly wanted to buy links from me for the PR juice, not to advertise his website. He also described my decision of putting nofollow tags on text ads as “stupid”. Dude, I’m selling text ads here to help you promote your site, not to give you the PageRank that you crave for. I hope that’s clear!

I want to know your thoughts about this. How do you find his e-mail? To the people who also put nofollow tags on text ads: Will you remove nofollow tags on your ads if majority of your advertisers request you to do so?

Other posts that you might find interesting:

14 Comments
Liked this post? Share it:
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Sphinn Mixx PlugIM Yahoo! MyWeb Spurl Reddit Furl
Subscribe to the RSS feeds to stay updated!

Current comments

  1. Kimota said: 13th December, 2007 at 11:49 am

    This chestnut just doesn’t seem to want to go away.

    Of course you should put nofollow tags on your links, otherwise you risk having your own PR penalised by Google. The advertiser is deluding himsself if he thinks the sole point of paid links is PR juice. A paid link on a good PR page with strong traffic will drive traffic through.

    It seems to me that this guy is only interested in Google traffic and none from other sources and also hasn’t done his research.

    He is paying for a link on an appropriate site with strong traffic - the equivalent of putting your billboard next to a busy road. He is NOT paying for PR, which is like painting your phone number onto someone else’s well-placed billboard.

    http://www.jonathancrossfield.com/blog/2007/12/is-google-really-the-bogeyman.html

  2. Dustin Coates said: 13th December, 2007 at 12:13 pm

    On the one hand, coming with experience on the other side, I can understand where he’s coming from. Everyone would prefer that text ads they buy are followed.

    On the other hand, if someone sells links and are going to put nofollow on them, move on. I have consistently been surprised in all of the jobs I’ve had where people expect to get their way after telling the other person that they’re stupid.

    As for me, if I’m going to let someone advertise with me I’ll follow the advertisements. I’m only going to let someone advertise who I trust and I endorse, so I might as well let the search engines know that.

  3. webhopper said: 13th December, 2007 at 12:29 pm

    Last time I checked, this is a free country, so why not let the owner of the site do as he pleases :roll: anyways, we usually can’t persuade, let alone change other people’s mind with angry use of words. Duh!!

  4. Juggler said: 13th December, 2007 at 2:26 pm

    Kimota: Nice analogy… great post as well. Thanks for dropping by!

    Dustin: Thanks for your opinion. ;)

    Webhopper: The guy will really not be able to build a good relationship with publishers (and persuade them) if he keeps on using those words.

  5. Lenz said: 13th December, 2007 at 8:01 pm

    I’m new to this advertising thing, but AFAIK advertising is supposed to get you more visitors and customers not some worthless Pagerank.

  6. Juggler said: 13th December, 2007 at 8:04 pm

    Exactly my point, Lenz. :D Thanks for visiting again! By the way, I got your e-mail and I sent a reply already. Do check it out. ;)

  7. multippt said: 13th December, 2007 at 8:35 pm

    PageRank is almost dead, well, maybe for now. Still, PageRank is important, and some go into the extremes.

    Anyways, he should realize that Google announced publicly on its blog regarding paid links that it will penalize webmasters.

  8. Juggler said: 14th December, 2007 at 8:38 am

    I think he knows about Google and paid links, but he just doesn’t care. All he wants is PR, I guess.

  9. multippt said: 14th December, 2007 at 9:14 am

    What’s the point of PR if he is going to get penalized for getting a paid link that passes PageRank? :roll:

  10. Mark said: 14th December, 2007 at 9:22 am

    pagerank still matters on google search algoritm, maybe a suggestion to place if webmaster is selling link is the disclosure of the fact that it will be no follow and you are advertising on the site for traffic and site exposure.

  11. Juggler said: 14th December, 2007 at 11:54 am

    Yeah… that’s my question too. :???: I’d like him to read this post and leave a comment here. I’m gonna send him an e-mail!!! :twisted:

  12. How to Make Money From Home said: 17th December, 2007 at 10:00 pm

    I agree with you 100%. However if when you sold the link it did pass PR you should of notified him to avoid situations like this. :mrgreen:

  13. Juggler said: 18th December, 2007 at 10:41 am

    Yes, that’s a nice suggestion. I’ll put a disclosure in my advertising page. :D Thanks for dropping by, Mark.

  14. diz said: 18th December, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    lol. stupid? xD i think he’s the one. lol… did you send an e-mail already? what was his reaction? :grin: :grin:

Post a comment

Copyright © 2008 The WWW Observer All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site may be copied without written permission from the author. Don't even try, plagiarists!